Moonwatch or Submariner? How to Choose Your First Serious Timepiece
Two legendary tool watches, two entirely different philosophies. Here's how to decide between the Omega Speedmaster and Rolex Submariner without regret.

The Choice That Defines Every Collection
At some point, every watch enthusiast faces the same crossroads: the Omega Speedmaster Professional or the Rolex Submariner. Both are icons, both have devoted followings, and both will outlast you. The Moonwatch vs Submariner debate isn't about which is objectively better (neither is), but rather which aligns with how you actually live and what you value in a mechanical timepiece.
Heritage: Space Race vs Ocean Floor
The Speedmaster earned its 'Moonwatch' nickname the hard way. NASA subjected it to vacuum chambers, extreme temperatures, and vibration tests in 1964, then strapped it to astronauts' wrists for every manned mission thereafter. Buzz Aldrin wore his on the lunar surface in 1969. That's not marketing mythology; it's documented fact.
The Submariner took a different route to legendary status. Rolex introduced it in 1953 as a proper dive watch rated to 100 metres, later pushing that to 200m and beyond. Jacques Cousteau didn't wear one (he favoured Blancpain's Fifty Fathoms), but countless recreational divers, military personnel, and eventually collectors did. By the 1980s, it had transcended its tool watch origins to become the default luxury sports watch.
When considering Moonwatch vs Submariner from a historical perspective, ask yourself: does the romance of space exploration resonate more than underwater adventure? Your answer matters more than you think.
The Practical Reality of Ownership
Here's where theory meets wrist time. The Speedmaster Professional runs on the hand-wound Calibre 1861 (or 3861 in current production), meaning you'll wind it daily. Some find this ritual meditative; others find it irritating when rushing out the door. The hesalite crystal scratches if you look at it wrong, though it polishes out with polyWatch in thirty seconds.
The Submariner offers the opposite experience. Its automatic movement winds itself, the ceramic bezel is virtually scratchproof, and the Oyster case shrugs off water and impacts. It's designed for thoughtless wear, which explains why so many become daily watches despite six-figure secondary market prices for certain references.
Functional differences worth noting:
- The Speedmaster's chronograph actually gets used; the Submariner's rotating bezel rarely does outside actual diving
- Speedmaster sits slimmer at roughly 13mm thick versus the Sub's 12.5-13mm (depending on reference), but wears larger due to its 42mm case and long lugs
- Submariner's date window (on Date models) proves more useful than expected; the Speedmaster's lack of date keeps the dial clean
- Lume performance favours the Submariner's larger indices, though both are excellent
Collectibility and Market Dynamics
The Moonwatch vs Submariner question shifts dramatically when you consider acquisition and resale. Speedmaster Professionals remain available at boutiques for list price. Walk in, buy one, walk out. The current sapphire sandwich version retails around £5,700, the hesalite version slightly less.
Submariner? Different story entirely. Authorized dealers maintain years-long waitlists, and grey market premiums run 30-100% depending on reference. The no-date ref. 124060 lists at £7,000 but trades closer to £10,000. Date models command even steeper premiums.
This accessibility gap matters. The Speedmaster lets you start your collection now; the Submariner forces you into either overpaying or waiting indefinitely. Neither option feels particularly appealing.
That said, Submariners hold value more aggressively. Speedmasters are excellent watches that retain reasonable resale percentages, but they're not investments. Certain Submariner references, particularly discontinued models, have appreciated substantially.
Which One Belongs on Your Wrist
If you're drawn to mechanical complexity, appreciate winding rituals, and prefer under-the-radar recognition from fellow enthusiasts, the Speedmaster makes perfect sense. It's the thinking person's sports watch, historically significant without the baggage of hype culture.
Choose the Submariner if you want true set-it-and-forget-it reliability, prefer the security of Rolex's brand recognition, and don't mind navigating the purchase process. It's the more versatile dress-up option, though the Speedmaster's no slouch on a leather strap.
The truth? Both watches will serve you brilliantly for decades. The Moonwatch vs Submariner debate ultimately resolves not through specification sheets but through honest self-assessment. Try both on, live with the decision for a week in your mind, then commit. You'll know which one feels like yours.
